An analysis of participation in a hybrid and asynchronous course

Authors

  • Laura Degenhardt TU Dresden
  • Manuel Bodirsky TU Dresden

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.25369/ll.v4i1/2.77

Abstract

Time and place-independent teaching supports students in mastering their studies independently of external, e.g. private, circumstances. Among other things, the use of hybrid and asynchronous teaching scenarios is suitable for this. Accordingly, it is a relevant and controversially discussed subject in higher education didactics, even after the Corona pandemic. It has not been clarified how hybrid teaching can be designed in a way that is effective for learning and how it can be further developed in a controlled manner. In the pilot project "TEORy - Try, Explore, Observe and Review hybrid Teaching", a technically and didactically trained person, the so-called e-scout, regularly supports and accompanies a hybrid course. This offers the possibility of evaluating each individual event of a lecture series and thus giving the lecturer continuous feedback on their course. In order to address the concerns expressed by lecturers regarding declining participation in hybrid courses with concrete figures, the development of participation figures on-site and online over the semester is examined on the basis of the E-Scout protocols. The first factors influencing the type of participation (online or on-site) in a hybrid teaching scenario will be worked out. It is assumed that, based on the observations and feedback, the implementation of hybrid and asynchronous courses makes sense under certain boundary conditions and that teachers should continue to be motivated to offer these teaching formats.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

German Science And Humanities Council, "Empfehlungen zur Digitalisierung in Lehre und Studium," 2022.

G. Reinmann, "Hybride Lehre - Ein Begriff und seine Zukunft für Forschung und Praxis," IMPACT FREE 35, 2021.

S. Herrmann und R. Freudenreich, "Herausforderung "Tafel" - Hybride Lehre im Modul Technische Thermodynamik an der Hochschule Zittau/Görlitz," Perspektiven auf Lehre. Journal for Higher Education and Academic Development, March 2023. https://doi.org/10.55310/jfhead.35

M. Magdowski, "Warum Hybridlehre bisher nicht (so richtig gut) funktioniert und was wir (noch) ändern müssen," Perspektiven auf Lehre. Journal for Higher Education and Academic Development, March 2023. https://doi.org/10.55310/jfhead.30

C. Böhm, "Digitale Lehre Hand in Hand," [Online]. Available: https://tu-dresden.de/zill/studienerfolg/digitale-lehre-hand-in-hand. [Zugriff am 25. 04. 2023].

C. Albrecht, A. Jantos und C. Böhm, "Hybride Lehrveranstaltungen - Spannungsfeld zwischen technischer Praktikabilität und didaktischem Anspruch," Perspektiven auf Lehre. Journal for Higher Education and Academic Development, March 2023. https://doi.org/10.55310/jfhead.31

L. Degenhardt und C. Albrecht, "Bedarfsanalyse zur digital gestützen Lehre im Bereich MN der TU Dresden," [Unveröffentlichtes Manuskript], 2022.

D. Großmann, C. Engel, J. Junkermann und T. Wolbring, Studentischer Workload: Definition, Messung und Einflüsse, Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-28931-7

U. Heublein, C. Hutzsch und R. Schmelzer, "DZHW-Brief 05|2022 - Die Entwicklung der Studienabbruchquoten in Deutschland," 2022.

Bundesamt für Statistik, "Studienverlaufsstatistik 2021," 2022.

R. Schulmeister und C. Metzger, Die Workload im Bachelor: Zeitbudget und Studierverhalten.: Eine empirische Studie, Waxmann Verlag GmbH, 2011.

L. Groß, M.-A. Boger, S. Harmann und M. Wedjelek, "Forschungsbericht ZEITLast - Standort Mainz," 2012.

Number of participants during the semester

Published

2024-12-24